- If you have not analyzed malware before, do not start with real, live, and potentially targeted malware. See the References section from the Advanced Threats method for opportunities to build your skills without putting the organization or yourself at additional risk.
- Any analysis must be done with extreme caution (using a dedicated system, carefully managed VM, with very limited/monitored if any network access)
- Continue to follow the Chain of Custody procedures described in the Evidence Capture activity
- Follow the procedures for logging and hashing described in the walkthrough
Keep a log of everything you do to analyze the data.
- What you connected it to, and how
- Each and every command you ran against the data image as you perform your investigation
- This log must identify who is performing the analysis
- Date and time stamps for each action performed
Only work on copies of the data, not the source data.
Ideally make multiple copies from the initial copy, as you may need to work on fresh copies if your analysis accidentally modifies the copy you are working on.
Immediately on receipt of the source data, make a cryptographic hash of that image, and store it in a safe place. This is your only guarantee that you have not tampered with the evidence you are working on!
After making a copy of the data, immediately create a cryptographic hash of that image, and check it against your master hash to ensure they match.
As you work on your investigation on a copy of the data, periodically check that data image with the cryptographic hash, to ensure you have not inadvertently modified the data by performing your investigation. If the hash does not match, then:
- Record the fact that the hash no longer matches in your activity log.
- Look in your log at all the steps you have taken between when you last checked the hash and now. One or more of the steps you have taken has modified the data of the copy, so you need to work out which step caused this, and how to perform a copy in the investigative step without modifying the data.
- Abandon the now modified copy of the data. This is tainted, so clearly mark it as such and return it to secure storage.
- Use a fresh copy of the data, again checking the hash to ensure it is clean before proceeding with the investigation.
- If necessary, make extra copies of the data from the original source image you created (making sure to never perform investigative steps on that source image).
Sleuth Kit is a kit of useful open source digital forensic tools to analyze the acquired data. Available tools in this kit include command line tools and a C library that allows you to analyze disk images and recover files from them, and a GUI-based program (Autopsy) that allows you to efficiently analyze hard drives and smartphones. Both tools can be found in the DEFT distro (The Sleuthkit 4.1.3), along with another useful tool kit (Digital Forensics Framework 1.3).
In most cases, reach out for help, there are multiple organizations which coordinate and can support malware analysis targeting NGOs. The Digital First Aid Kit has a list of CiviCERT organizations to seek support in doing advanced analysis. Citizen Lab is also well known for their analysis and research.
There are some procedures that must be followed to ensure the evidence is properly handled while the forensic analysis is taking place. These include:
In order to facilitate the data analysis, we recommend to get the output data from the image acquisition in raw/dd format, which is accepted as input file in several forensic analysis tools.
To analyze the acquired data, you can use the following tools:
If any indicators of compromise are found, using the Suspicious Activity Analysis approach to do very initial research/analysis and triage (are these known malware or adware IoCs, etc.), and adjusting your reporting and operational security procedures with the organization as appropriate.